A | The CAS held the first of two planned hearings of the Football Union of Russia and club teams’ appeal of a FIFA/UEFA ban from UEFA competition on Tuesday.,Tuesday’s hearing, taking place in Lausanne, Switzerland, will be followed by a second hearing next Monday by four Russian clubs, including Zenit St. Petersburg, the reigning Russian Premier League champions, challenging their exclusion from UEFA competition.,UEFA ruled in May to bar Russian football clubs from all tournaments, including men’s teams and the women’s team for the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2023. At least for the remainder of the current season, Russian teams have been banned from the UEFA Champions League, Europa League, Europa Conference League, Women’s Champions League, and Youth League. The Russian bid to host the Euro 2028 and/or Euro 2032 events has also been preemptively rejected.,In arbitration filed in March, the Football Union of Russia demanded the immediate reinstatement of all teams for competition, arguing the “irreparable harm” that their exclusion would have on tournaments, including the FIFA World Cup, potential sponsorship losses, loss of experience, and loss of opportunity to compete against opponents of high standard. The Russian side also stressed that for players 30 years old or older, the 2022 World Cup constituted “the last chance of their career to play such a tournament.”,Former Formula One Boss Ecclestone Backs Putin Over Conflict With Ukraine30 June, 12:39 GMT,The football union argued that the International Olympic Committee resolution issued in February demanding that Russian athletes and officials be barred from international competition on which FIFA and UEFA based their decisions was “generic,” “does not refer to any legal provision and is not binding upon FIFA,” and that sporting authorities were acting in a “discriminatory” manner by barring Russian players.,FIFA argued that Russian teams’ presence or absence in the World Cup and the Women’s World Cup was “not guaranteed,” and dismissed the fact that some players would miss out on their last chance for their World Cup play as “irrelevant.” Furthermore, the association argued that “pursuant to CAS jurisprudence, private sports associations have a wide autonomy and margin of discretion when deciding on matters related to the competitions which they organize.” The CAS sided with FIFA and UEFA and rejected Russia’s cases in April, prompting FUR to appeal.,US Hybrid War Against Russia,Rick Sterling, a California-based investigative journalist who has written extensively on doping in sports, said he finds it unlikely that the CAS will rule in Russia's favor despite its case's "excellent arguments," among them the idea that you don't punish athletes for the actions of their nations.,"The US invaded Iraq and there was no denunciation let alone a punishment of athletes. The US, France and others overthrew the Libyan government, leaving a destroyed state, without criticism from the IOC or FIFA. So why are the Russian athletes being punished? One reason is because of built-in bias and prejudice. The IOC and FIFA are dominated by the West. It is very damaging that the IOC issued a recommendation that Russian athletes be discriminated against. This is a violation of the Olympic Charter against national discrimination," Sterling says.,"The US is openly and actively working to undermine Russia's image abroad, including in sports. They probably pre-coordinated the response to the special operation. Russian athletes are victims of the US hybrid war against Russia, as are Ukrainians and Russians," the journalist believes.,Football isn’t the only sport to have suffered from politicized bans instituted by world and national sporting authorities in the wake of the escalation of the Ukraine crisis, with tennis, basketball, hockey, skating and skiing competitions also affected. The arbitrary nature of the prohibitions has been exemplified by their random nature, with Russian athletes barred from FIFA play, for example, but allowed to compete in the 2022 Winter Paralympics, and at the US Open tennis tournament.,Top Tennis Stars in Favour of Penalising Wimbledon Over Ban on Russian Players, Report Says11 May, 11:40 GMT,The bans affecting Russia’s football players are just the latest instance of discrimination against the country’s athletes by international sporting bodies in recent years. In 2020, the CAS stripped Russia of its right to use its name, flag, and anthem at the Olympics and world championship events for two years, largely on the basis of the testimony of Grigory Rodchenkov, the former director of the Russian Anti-Doping Center laboratory-turned-informant to the World Anti-Doping who fled to the United States and testified about an alleged Russian “state-run doping program.” Russian officials denied the allegations and accused Rodchenkov of altering doping probe data of Russian athletes to fit the required narrative.。 记者从浙江省市场监管局获悉：浙江以数字化改革为牵引，从准入把关、信息公示、智慧监管到社会共治全链条发力，探索推出主体资质自动校验、“电子证照”公示、无堂食外卖聚集区建设、“AI+非现场监管”等多项治理举措，有效治理外卖后厨脏乱差、商家证照造假以及“幽灵外卖”等问题。 针对一些外卖商家用假证照、冒用证件就能上线接单的问题，浙江省与部分外卖平台建立证照核验比对机制，打通政企数据壁垒。商家申请入驻时，平台通过数据接口比对校验证照资质信息；校验不成功的，由平台业务员线下核查。 浙江于2024年起推行“电子证照”公示制度，依托全省统一电子证照库，建立与外卖平台的“电子证照”共享机制，平台在商家资质校验通过后，自动调用市场监管数据库中的“电子证照”并在页面公示，从源头杜绝假证、套证等问题。截至目前，各平台累计拦截异常入驻申请4.2万家次，调用“电子证照”超40万家次，电子证照公示率近95%。 针对无堂食外卖商户散布在街头巷尾，经营隐蔽、监管难度大的问题，浙江创新推出外卖聚集区管理模式，首创“管理方+商户”自治机制。管理方取得“餐饮服务管理”许可资质，对区内商户实施“一档一证”管理。 针对人工巡查覆盖面有限、夜间无法监管的问题，浙江推行“AI+非现场监管”，建立全国首个“明厨AI”垂直大模型，自主研发视频诊断、环境评估、鼠迹识别、操作规范四大算法。系统对接入“阳光厨房”的19万家商户全量开展“静态+动态”自动巡检后厨卫生、人员违规操作等。（记者窦皓）。
B |
Current article:http://v39w.shaihanhuangwoshang.cyou/news/20260826_3574894.html
Published on:09:42:18
